The Human Beyond Repetition: Cloning, Identity, and the Limits of Techno-Humanist Optimism in Caryl Churchill’s A Number
Abstract views: 219
/ 
PDF downloads: 74
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16752828Keywords:
Caryl Churchill, A Number, Cloning, Techno-Humanism, British DramaAbstract
Caryl Churchill’s play A Number explores the emotionally charged relationship between Salter and his cloned sons—Bernard (B1), Bernard (B2), and Michael Black—against the disquieting backdrop of human cloning. While previous scholarship has focused on themes of identity, familial rupture, and ethical accountability, this article offers a distinct perspective by situating the play within the framework of techno-humanism—the belief in using technology to enhance or redefine human nature. Rather than endorsing this vision, Churchill maintains a critical distance, exposing the psychological and ethical dislocations that cloning entails. Through close textual analysis of key scenes and supported by bioethical and philosophical reflections, this study argues that A Number presents cloning not as a scientific triumph but as a site of existential destabilisation. By foregrounding the tensions between technological possibility and human meaning, the play offers a powerful and unresolved interrogation of what it means to be human in the age of biotechnology.
References
Ayala, F. J. (2015). Cloning humans? Biological, ethical, and social considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(29), 8879–8886. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501798112
Brock, D. W. (2002). Human cloning and our sense of self. Science, 296(5566), 314–316. Retrieved March 24, 2025, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3076515
Campos, L. (2012). “Any number is a shock”: Figuring humanity in Caryl Churchill’s A Number. Coup de théâtre, 26(Autour de Caryl Churchill), 27–41. Retrieved from https://hal.science/hal-01293851v1
Chadwick, R. F. (1982). Cloning. Philosophy, 57(220), 201–209. Retrieved March 24, 2025, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4619559
Churchill, C. (2014). A Number. In C. Churchill, Caryl Churchill plays: Four (pp. 161-206). London, UK: Nick Hern Books.
Elliott, D. (1998). Uniqueness, individuality, and human cloning. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 15(3), 217–230. Retrieved March 24, 2025, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/24354279
Griffin, G. (2012). More than a number: Reproductive technologies, cloning and the problematic of fatherhood in Caryl Churchill’s A Number. Atlantis, 34(2), 11–32. Retrieved March 24, 2025, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26453022
Harari, Y. N. (2017). Homo deus: A brief history of tomorrow. London, UK: Vintage. Retrieved from https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=dWYyCwAAQBAJ
Klotzko, A. J. (2002). A Number [Review of the play A Number, by Caryl Churchill.] BMJ: British Medical Journal, 325(737), 1043. Retrieved March 24, 2025, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/25452803
Kodak, D. (2024). Spekülatif gelecek tartışmaları ekseninde tekno-hümanizm ve toplum 5.0: Sistematik bir değerlendirme. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(51), 2224–2246. https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.1559300
Kumar, A. (2010). Human cloning: A socio-legal and ethical appraisal. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 52(1), 92–109. Retrieved March 24, 2025, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/43953484
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York, U.S.A. : Penguin Books. Retrieved from https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=9FtnppNpsT4C
Marcus, A. (2012). The ethics of human cloning in narrative fiction. Comparative Literature Studies, 49(3), 405–433. Retrieved March 24, 2025, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/complitstudies.49.3.0405
McMahan, J. (1999). Cloning, killing and identity. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(2), 77–86. Retrieved March 24, 2025, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27718261
Robertson, J. A. (1994). The question of human cloning. The Hastings Center Report, 24(2), 6–14. Retrieved March 24, 2025, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/356217
Rollin, B. E. (1999). Keeping up with the cloneses: Issues in human cloning. The Journal of Ethics, 3(1), 51–71. Retrieved March 24, 2025, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/25115600
Tannert, C. (2006). Thou shalt not clone: An ethical argument against the reproductive cloning of humans. EMBO Reports, 7(3), 238–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400653
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Atlas Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
